6/29/2009

Roses

I've just come home from our third funeral since November.  If you ask me, that's too many.  This one was for my sister-in-law's father, who was K's mentor and our very close friend for the past four years.  He died of pancreatic cancer, something he was only diagnosed with when we learned my SIL was pregnant for the second time.  My niece was born Wednesday.  Our friend died Saturday.  There were a lot of tears, but apparently I bought waterproof mascara without meaning to, so props to me.  I feel so incredibly lucky that my mom's breast cancer looks by all accounts to be the "best" kind of cancer you could hope for.  I feel heartbroken for our friend's wife who only had five years with him.  I don't know what I'd do if it were I giving a eulogy at my husband's funeral after so short a time; I don't think I could do it.  But I guess no time will ever be enough, whether five years or fifty-five.

All three of the men who've died since November were Jewish, but this was the first funeral of the three with a more elaborate coffin (instead of simple, unvarnished wood), a brief viewing (instead of a totally closed), and flowers on top of the closed casket.  It was a breathtaking burst of white lilies, white stock, and creamy, full roses.  The rabbi related a story which I found just lovely:

Two children found a beautiful garden full to overflowing with rosebushes.  The two children ran about and played as their mother watched them.  After a time, one of the children came running out, clinging to his mother and sobbing.  "What's wrong?" asked the mother.  The child replied, "This garden is full of beautiful rosebushes, but the bushes also have thorns, and they scratch and prick and hurt.  This is an awful place to be."  After a time, the second child came running out, laughing and joyful.  "What makes you so happy?" asked the mother.  The second child replied, "This garden is full of thorn bushes, sure, but on top of the bushes are the most beautiful roses.  This is a wonderful place to be."

It doesn't take a theologian or a master of metaphor to know that this life is that garden.  And it doesn't take god, I don't think, to appreciate striving to be that second child.  Our friend was very decidedly the second child in that story.  We'll miss him.   A lot.

6/17/2009

Properties

Bodies ≠ public property.

You'd think this would be common sense, but apparently not.  In fact, based on anecdotal evidence, I'd say that a larger percentage of people understand the Boltzmann Distribution* than understand that someone else's body is private mental property.

I went to a lot of camps over the course of my childhood and young adulthood.  Ballet camp, gymnastics camp, theatre camp, another sort of theatre camp, sixteen-year-olds running a camp for four-year-olds out of their parents' house camp (we made Play-Doh from scratch), puppetry camp (ya, rly), shitty Catholic elementary school excuse for summer daycare where I was thoroughly traumatized at the tender age of 5 camp, Shakespeare camp (not to be confused with generic theatre camp), all-girls sleep away camp, nerd camp (Georgia Governor's Honors Program), and of course, eating disorder camp.  

That last "camp" is most relevant to this blog, obviously, but so are some of the others, particularly ballet and gymnastics camps, as you might have guessed.  When I was eight, my verbally abusive (called second graders fat, in public) ballet instructor wanted to put me on pointe.  (That's WAY too young.)  Between that and being called fat, and being screamed at all the damn time, I told my mom, not in so many words, "Fuck this."  She told me, in so many words, "You quit everything," and not in so many words, "I don't believe you about Miss Jan."  In my mom's defense, I was a drama princess from the word Go, so I don't blame her at all for thinking that I was fabricating the things Miss Jan said.  What do you know, but fourteen years later my mom and I run into the owner of the ballet studio, Miss Lee, at Lincoln Center.  (If I'd had Miss Lee instead of Miss Jan, I'd probably be a dancer, FTR.  No kidding.  She was such a wonderful woman and teacher, when I had her, the kind who couldn't help but imbue her pupils with the love and respect she felt for dance.)  What does Miss Lee say when we mention Miss Jan but, "Oh dear.  She was a mistake.  I'm so sorry you had her.  I remember that you should have been with me."  After some pleasantries, my mom and I sauntered along to see The Light in the Piazza and Miss Lee and the two dancers with her went to the NYC Ballet performance that evening.  My mom turned to me and acknowledged, "Well, you were right about Miss Jan, huh?"  I couldn't really reply without sounding slightly bitter, so I commented on the play bill.

Miss Jan in particular (and ballet and dance in general) is a personally compelling example of people taking the false premise of the Public Property Body to the extreme.  She's also an instance of the passing on of the Public Property Body idea into the subconsciousness of her students.  Tell me how an eight-year-old is supposed to set up mental defenses against an authority figure - one whose authority is based around movements of the body - who tells her that her body is open to comment, criticism, and correction?  "Straighten your leg" or "point those toes" are in one category, of course, and that category is called "Ballet."  "You're getting a pot belly" and "suck in your gut" are in a totally different category, and that is called "Child Abuse."  Especially when the eight-year-old in question does not have a pot belly, or a gut, or saddlebags, or what have you.  But you tell me how eight-year-olds are supposed to retain the idea that their bodies are not open for comment and criticism when they hear this week after week?

Move out from the specific instance of a specific ballet instructor, and widen your scope to see all the strangers who comment on pregnant women's bodies. (A non-stranger example:  My FIL to my SIL recently: "Boy, I just have to say, you look so much better with this pregnancy than you did with [my nephew].  You looked so big an uncomfortable last time!"  My SIL:  "Oh, FIL."  Me:  "FIL, are you kidding?")  Think of the last friend or family member you saw for the first time in a while.  Did one or both of you immediately launch into, "You look great!" or "You've lost weight!"?  And, naturally, look at any of the magazines in the grocery store's checkout line.  Don't even get me started.

We've got to fight this, in others and in ourselves.  We've got to war against the socialized impulse to claim subconscious ownership or control of others' bodies, and to allow it of our own, because ownership is what it comes down to.  Think about it: what on earth would possess you to comment on someone's body (whether to their face or behind their back) if you weren't on some level sure that it was yours to comment upon?  Why would you be socially trained to tell someone, "You look great!" instead of, "You seem so happy!" unless you'd been taught to believe something insidious about their body, your opinions, and their life?  You don't have to agree with me here, and you're more than welcome to decide I'm hyperbolizing and on about nothing here, but just think about it next time you catch yourself looking at an overweight person and thinking about their body, or the next time you see a pregnant woman sampling bleu cheese at Whole Foods.  Just take a step back and think about it, and see where your reactions are really coming from, whatever they are.  You might be surprised.


*If I think about this one too hard, I become convinced that I can feel my skin molecules colliding with each other and constantly changing velocity.  And no, I do not smoke pot.

Asparagus: Good for More than Making Your Pee Smell

I have proof.

6/16/2009

Ya, Rly

I just had to teach my  husband how to boil eggs.

How he survived college, I'll never know.

6/10/2009

Peachy Keen

My mom has had her surgery and everything appears to be great, as much as a cancer prognosis can be "great," that is. Lymph nodes look clear, nothing seems to have spread, and she seems to be a candidate for some kind of "quicker" radiation they have now. Doctors and their newfangled technology. Pfft.

She had her surgery on Tuesday, so I spent most of Monday baking a really, truly time-consuming peach pie. I wasn't sure why I'd even decided to randomly bake a peach pie that day, until I stepped back and thought about what the next day was, and about the fact that I was, after all, raised in the Peach State and wishing fervently that I could be there this particular week.

Then I proceeded to be completely unable to consume any of the peach pie I'd spent about four hours making, between the crust and the peaches. (They were, contrary to the way they were advertised, cling-stone peaches, not very ripe, and not very big. Slicing them up took almost an hour and a half, but at least I managed not to take off any fingertips.) I couldn't make myself eat even the littlest slice, so sure was I that I'd sit there and eat the whole thing, or not eat another thing after a tiny slice. Maybe I underestimated myself. Maybe I would have been able to chow down just fine on a perfectly normal-sized piece of pie (which was, after all, not even made with real sugar). Maybe I'd have been able to reconcile a perfectly fine piece of pie as "dessert," instead of the fake ice cream I've been eating lately. But on Monday and Tuesday and this morning, all I could do about that pie was stare at it and wish I weren't wasting food, and unsuccessfully try to convince myself that my natural and normal hunger and satiety signals were more powerful than a stupid, symbolic pie.

I finally had some just now (now that I know my mom's going to be okay, interestingly), so I figured I was finally allowed to publish that Yum Yum post without being a total hypocrite. And the pie was, in fact, very yum yum.

6/01/2009

How To

How to Find Yourself Goaded Into Justifiable Homicide

What does it mean to be a young woman in the contemporary U.S.?  Obviously it doesn't mean just one thing, but what does it mean to you?  Whether or not you are a woman, or young, or neither or both, think about what that idea means to you.  I won't get all long-winded and philosophical on you here, but let me illustrate for you the circumstances which brought about that line of thought today.  I don't blog outright about my marriage much here: it's a privacy thing.   But this was a bit too much not to share.  You know we work together, and have since before we got married.  That's pretty much all you need to know for this scenario.

The scene:  I'm listening to my voicemail and hear a message from my dentist's office asking me to confirm my appointment tomorrow.  I mention this to my better half as I'm dialing my phone.  The old ball and chain starts to get mad.  At me.  Because I won't cancel the appointment.  To save money.  My dentist appointment.  I won't cancel it.  Because teeth are important.  And I go twice a year.  Like you're supposed to.  I won't cancel it.  And he's getting annoyed/mad that I want to spend $130 on the maintenance of my oral health.  And then he grumbles, mumbles a bit, and I hear:

"... eating up all my money..."

All my money.  All my money.  Eating up all my money.

So I'll ask you again:  what does it mean to be a young woman in the contemporary U.S.?  It sure as shit doesn't mean that to me.